Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff: JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVID v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02084
Petitioner: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff: RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant: JOE BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
BELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00779
Defendant: PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, CIA and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00798
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COURTROOM LEGISLATORS, JOE BIDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: THOMAS PHILLIP BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POHLE v. PENCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant: JOHN G ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL L. POHLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOSKINS v. BIDEN
as 1:2015cv00299
Defendant: JOE BIDEN
Plaintiff: HOMER E. HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01353
Defendant: JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff: BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv01829
Defendant: JOE BIDEN and BARACK OBAMA
Plaintiff: EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?