Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Starnes v. Gates et al
as 7:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Howard Randall Starnes, II
Defendant:
Bill Gates and Ed Macory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
York v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sarah York
Defendant:
Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., Garren Colvin, Gary Blank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Starnes v. USA et al
as 7:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Howard Randall Starnes, II
Defendant:
USA, Bill Gates, Ed Macory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Gravity Diagnostics, LLC v. Laboratory Billing Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Laboratory Billing Solutions, LLC and Laboratory Billing Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gravity Diagnostics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hafner v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
as 0:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Bill Hensley and Boyd County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Hafner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kapri v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00117
Defendant:
L. Moore, Lt. T. Melvin, William Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Kapri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kapri v. Joyner
as 7:2020cv00118
Respondent:
H. Joyner
Petitioner:
Bill Kapri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sumpter v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
as 0:2020cv00086
Defendant:
Bill Hensley, Boyd County Detention Center and Boyd County, Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Clarence Riley Sumpter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
