Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Reed v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Tony Reed
Respondent:
USP McCreary, Dr. Parsons, Dr. R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Georgetown College et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
William A. Jones, Amy R. Jones, Annalise Jones and others
Defendant:
Georgetown College, Board of Trustees of Georgetown College, Rosemary A. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pedrin v. Middleton et al
as 6:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, C. Mabe, Officer T. Middleton and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Joseph Pedrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Jones et al
as 6:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Mr. M. Dyer, Ms. R. Jones, Ms. A. Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leland Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Cunnagin et al
as 6:2019cv00094
Defendant:
R. Jones, USP-McCreary Medical Staff, USP-McCreary and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. John Does sued as "The Unknown Members of the Utilization Review Committee"
as 6:2019cv00011
Defendant:
R. Jones, Ian Connors, Dankqua Vibete and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruckmann v. Covington Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
David L. Bruckmann
Defendant:
Officer J. Zerhusen, Officer D. Griswald, Covington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Jones et al
as 6:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniel
Defendant:
R. Jones and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Ormond et al
as 6:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Defendant:
Ormond, Salinas, K. Baire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Bennett-Baker et al
as 6:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Burl Washington
Defendant:
K. Bennett-Baker, Barron, R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.