Cases 1 - 10 of 26
SIDES v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
BOBBY KIMBROUGH, JOHN DOE CORPORATION, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALLEN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00948
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DAN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
NISLEY et al v. VAUGHAN et al
as 1:2020cv00297
Plaintiff:
JOLENE TROYER, DAVID TROYER, JOSIAH CHAVEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT DAN KNOTT and NANCY VAUGHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Defendant:
J. SOUTHERN and DANNY ROGERS
Plaintiff:
DAN ELVERTUS MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
