Cases 21 - 30 of 122
EYAJAN v. NESCO RESOURCE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
BILL KAYDO, RANDY EDWARDS, COMMUNITY HEALTH NET and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHEY v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv01521
Defendant:
JAY COSTA, JR., MONA N. GENERETT, CHARLES M. POWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FRANCES ARCHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2018cv00216
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C. JERRY-EL
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, PAUL NOEL, JAWAD SALAMEH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JAY v. FISHER
as 2:2018cv01331
Defendant:
DARREN FISHER
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Dr. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, JAY COWAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00200
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN, RAYMOND CASTRO, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLER v. SOUTH CONNELLSVILLE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2018cv00919
Defendant:
SOUTH CONNELLSVILLE BOROUGH, DON RINGER, JERRY REAGAN and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL P. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
