Cases 51 - 60 of 202
Hughes v. Washburn
as 2:2019cv00152
Respondent:
Russell Washburn
Petitioner:
Martin Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Murfreesboro, TN et al
as 3:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Rutherford County, TN and Murfreesboro, TN
Plaintiff:
Marques D Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Loudon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Loudon County General Sessions Court, Officer Dallas Hilton, Captain Keener and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubenstein v. University of Tennessee
as 1:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Wayne Davis, Matthew Scoggins, Society of Actuaries and others
Plaintiff:
Steven J Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gold's Southeast, LLC v. West 2 East Land, LP et al (PLR1)
as 3:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Martin E O'Boyle and West 2 East Land, LP
Plaintiff:
Gold's Southeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackbriar Capital Management, LLC et al v. Senenfelder et al
as 3:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Kenneth Ray Davin, Thomas M. Senenfelder, Energex Pipeline Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Blackbriar Energex Production Trust I and Blackbriar Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zelaya et al v. Miles et al (PLR1)
as 3:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Billy Riggins, M. Grooms, Robert Hammer and others
Plaintiff:
Catarino Zapote Hernandez, Isabel Zelaya, Martha Pulido and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens v. Johnson, et al
as 3:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
James H Owens, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Martin, Theresa Johnson and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Terrisa Johnson, Larry Martin and David Ray
Plaintiff:
James McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. USA
as 3:2018cv00357
Petitioner:
Carson Nathan Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
