Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cofield et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cofield and Karen A. Cofield
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation, David I. Beem, Tyrone L. Beem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wills v. Pszczolkowski
as 5:2022cv00005
Petitioner:
Johnnie Franklin Wills
Respondent:
Karen Pszczolkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Maston et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jason Glenn Carroll
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Karen Townson and Betsey Jividen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goysovich v. Straughn et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Superintendent Shawn Straughn, John Does(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Goysovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godlove v. Humphrey Management, et al et al
as 3:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Beth Hooper, Stephen Nehrt, Tom Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Godlove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cantrell v. Strong et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Reggie Sellers, Jeremy Killgore, Spencer Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Green v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 3:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Todd Mitchell Green
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service, Val Ruthig and Karen Radcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
