Cases 51 - 60 of 1,703
Moore v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Edward Moore
Defendant:
Superintendent, Sgt. Smith, Ofc. Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Deloris Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Smith v. Joe Holland Chevrolet, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Smith
Defendant:
Joe Holland Chevrolet, Inc.
Smith v. United States America et al
as 5:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jean Smith
Defendant:
United States America, FBI U.S. Beckley Court House, FBI Charleston Court House and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Oiler et al
as 3:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Chad Smith
Defendant:
Brandon Oiler, William M. Mullins, Stephen Lusher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis
as 2:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Putnam County Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00520
Cross Claimant:
James Mark McCoy
Plaintiff:
Leslie May Greene and B. G.
Cross Defendant:
The Putnam County Commission, Mark A. Sorsaia, Jennifer Scragg Karr and others
Defendant:
Mark McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith, Craig Roberts and Commissioner Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duty v. Runyon et al
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Danny Nathaniel Page Duty
Defendant:
Daniel Runyon, Jeffery Daniel Williams, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
