Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Dick v. Fahey
as 3:2010cv00505
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Dick, Jr.
Respondent:
Helen Fahey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skakel v. Murphy
as 3:2007cv01625
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Skakel, Michael C. Skakel and Michael C. Skakel
Defendant:
Peter J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Flaherty
as 3:2010cv00536
Petitioner:
Eric C. Wilson
Respondent:
W. Steven Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Fahey
as 3:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
Danial J. Williams
Respondent:
Helen Fahey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tice v. Johnson
as 3:2008cv00069
Petitioner:
Derek Elliott Tice
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AL-NASHIRI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01207
Petitioner:
ABD AL-RAHIM HUSSAIN MOHAMMED AL-NASHIRI
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY, CONDELEEZA RICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Doppstadt et al
as 6:2008cv00678
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Eric W Doppstadt and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHES v. NERI et al
as 2:2008cv00251
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
EMILIANO NERI, PATRICE G. ADCROFT and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHES v. BAHREE et al
as 2:2008cv00252
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
MEGHA BAHREE, ZACK O'MALLEY GREENBURG and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riches v. Duke Energy Corporation et al
as 7:2008cv00167
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Duke Energy Corporation and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
