Cases 111 - 120 of 188
Doe v. Ejercito de Liberacion Naciona
as 17-759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Doe
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Third-Party-Defendant:
American Life Insurance Company, incorrectly pleaded as "Metropolitan Life Insurance Company", Alico Life Insurance Company, Lebanon Branch, improperly pleaded as "Metropolitan Life Insurance Company", Estate of Donald J. Havlish, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company, of America and Commerzbank AG, New York Branch
Defendant:
Ejercito de Liberacion National, AKA ELN, National Liberation Army and Fuerza Armadas Revolucionarios de Colombia, AKA FARC, Standard Chartered Bank and others
USA v. Antonio Cauich-Gamboa
as 17-10096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO CAUICH-GAMBOA, also known as Marco Antonio Arce Araico
Victor Angulo Gamboa v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73882
Petitioner:
VICTOR LUPO ANGULO GAMBOA, AKA Lorenzo Roman
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
USA v. Jaime Martinez-Gamboa
as 16-17142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAIME MARTINEZ-GAMBOA
Gamboa v. Murphy
as 8:2016cv03716
Petitioner:
Jhenny Elizabeth Gamboa
Respondent:
Todd Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
LOJA et al v. MELLA et al
as 2:2016cv04251
Plaintiff:
LUIS PATRICIO NAULA LOJA , JOSE ANTONIO NAULA LOJA , LUZ VICTORIA CASTRO SUMBA and others
Defendant:
EPHRAIM TAHIR MELLA , THE LAW OFFICES OF TAHIR MELLA, P.C. , WANDA MELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gamboa v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02553
Plaintiff:
Dante Gamboa
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
