Cases 121 - 130 of 155
Mullins et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
James R Mullins, Jr. and Kathleen Mullins
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC , Bank of America, N.A., Friendly Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tzu Ling Hsu et al v. AIM United, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00505
Defendant:
AIM United, LLC, Anchor Assets II LLC, Anchor Loans, LP and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Gill, as Chapter 7 Trustee, Li Hsiu Chu Hsu and Tzu Ling Hsu
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carol Oney v. PennyMac Mortgage Investment
as 15-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL JEAN ONEY, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNYMAC MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST HOLDINGS, I LLC, other, PennyMac Holdings LLC; other, PennyMac Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
