Cases 151 - 160 of 250
Peter Deng v. Matthew G. Whitaker
as 19-1095
Petitioner:
Peter Garang Deng
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Martinez-Mendoza v. Barr
as 19-9506
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting United States Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
DORIS ABIGAIL MARTINEZ-MENDOZA
Enrique Machin Gonzalez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60035
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE D. MACHIN GONZALEZ, also known as Enrique Daniel Machin
Denis Sanchez-Rojas v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60054
Petitioner:
DENIS OMAR SANCHEZ-ROJAS
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Xu v. Barr, et al
as 19-1044
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BROPHY, Assistant Field Office Director, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIQUN XU, a/k/a Dan Xu
Gayle v. Barr
as 19-152
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lynroy Gayle
AKHTAR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ELIZABETH MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
NAVEED AKHTAR
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329
Claudien Francois v. William Barr
as 19-70004
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CLAUDIEN FRANCOIS
Rogelio Sanchez-Mendoza v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60010
Petitioner:
ROGELIO SANCHEZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
