Cases 11 - 20 of 1,122
Bluming v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
as 1:2024cv04120
Plaintiff:
Dov Bluming
Defendant:
LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Inter Insurance Agency Services Ltd. et al v. Insurance Department of the State of Oklahoma et al
as 2:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Inter Insurance Agency Services Ltd. and Universal Casualty Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Insurance Department of the State of Oklahoma and Glen Mulready
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Hewannora Construction, Inc
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FELIX PAYNE, ANDREW WILLIAMS, KEREN CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
