Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Sirikanjanachai v. Plymouth County Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 19-1585
Defendant / Appellee: PLYMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Massachusetts and LISA A. MUSCATO, Deputy Sheriff of Plymouth County, Brockton, Massachusetts
Plaintiff / Appellant: GINGER SIRIKANJANACHAI, f/k/a Wanpen Florentine
Borel-Donohue v. Welbilt, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00191
Defendant: John O. Stewart, Haresh Shah, Hubertus M. Muehlhaeuser and others
Plaintiff: Christoph Borel-Donohue, The Plymouth County Retirement Association, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust and others
Plymouth County Retirement System v. Patterson Companies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv00871
Defendant: Ann B. Gugino, Patterson Companies, Inc., Scott P. Anderson and others
Plaintiff: Plymouth County Retirement System
Petitioner: Employees Retirement System of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Pembroke Pines Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers, Central Laborers Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Adair County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as IAS/4:18-cv-00011
Plaintiff: Adair County , Adams County , Audubon County and others
Defendant: Purdue Pharma LP , Purdue Pharma Inc , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois v. Envision Healthcare Corporation, et al.,
as 3:2017cv01323
Plaintiff: Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois
Defendant: Envision Healthcare Corporation , Christopher A. Holden , William A. Sanger and others
Movant: PLYMOUTH COUNTY CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION v. ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01940
Plaintiff: PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Defendant: ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY, ROBERT W MUSSLEWHITE and MICHAEL T KIRSHBAUM
Movant: CITY OF ATLANTA FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION FUND and CITY OF ATLANTA POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bettis v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01112
Defendant: Claire M. Gulmi, Christopher A. Holden, Envision Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Terry W. Bettis
Consolidated Plaintiff: Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois and Central Laborers' Pension Fund
Consolidated Defendant: Michael L. Smith, Ronald A. Williams, Richard J. Schnall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Corvex Master Fund LP and Corvex Select Equity Master Fund LP
Not Classified By Court: Wells Capital Management, Inc.
Interested Party: KPMG, LLP
Petitioner: Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, Michael Avenia, CFG Custom Portfolio Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Harrington, et al v. Tetraphase Pharm. Inc., et al
as 17-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant: PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and NEWVANA VENTURES LIMITED
Plaintiff: DAN SCHLAPKOHL, DARYLL HANDELL, MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD and others
Defendant - Appellee: GUY MACDONALD, JOHN CRAIG THOMPSON, DAVID LUBNER and others
North Collier Fire Control v. MDC Partners Inc.
as 16-3727
Plaintiff - Appellant: North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District Firefighter Pension Plan, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated and Plymouth County Retirement Association
Defendant - Appellee: MDC Partners Inc., Miles S. Nadal, David B. Doft and others
Schlapkohl v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10577
Plaintiff: Dan Schlapkohl , Daryll Handell and Plymouth County Retirement System
Defendant: Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Guy Macdonald , John Craig Thompson and others
Movant: Gustavo Rivera De La Fuente and Plymouth County Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?