Cases 41 - 50 of 1,979
Chew v. Graphite Bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Glen Chew
Defendant:
Graphite Bio, Inc., Perry Karsen, Abe Bassan and others
Almonte Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-516
Petitioner:
MARIANELA JULISSA ALMONTE HERNANDEZ and MIKEYLA ARIANA JIMENEZ ALMONTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Jimenez-Rodriguez
as 24-1089
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS YADIER JIMENEZ-RODRIGUEZ
USA v. Esthelio Jimenez
as 24-10267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ESTHELIO JIMENEZ
Perez et al v. HITT Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mc00031
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez, Alejandra Torres and Arys Solano
Defendant:
HITT Contracting, Inc., Brother's Mechanical, Inc., DAYCJ Plumbing & Mechanical Inc. and others
Garnishee:
Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo N.A.
United States of America v. Wilkes
as 24-188
Defendant:
RONALD BIDON, VINCENT MESCREA, Agent of Vincent Mescrea, JOSE NEGRON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEEL WILKES and Biggs
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Salas v. City of Galena Park
as 24-20034
Plaintiff:
Hector Salas, Sr., individually and as representative of the Estate of Hector Salas, Jr., Andrea Silva, individually,, as next friend H. S., as next friend A. S. and Cynthia Montiel, as next friend E. S.
Defendant:
City of Galena Park and Cynthia Jimenez, in her individual and official capacity
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. KOZYRA et al
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
BARRY A. KOZYRA and JIMENEZ CIGAR LOUNGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
De Leon Jimenez v. Garland
as 24-81
Petitioner:
ISRAEL DE LEON JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. Jimenez, et al.
as 23-4326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
M. JIMENEZ, J. G. LOPEZ, R. REDDING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
