Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 883
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant: Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner: JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayne
as 2:2023mc50462
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00493
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. As-Samad Haynes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-4738
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: AS-SAMAD HAYNES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Norris v. Haynes
as 22-2025
Petitioner: BRACH EDWARD NORRIS
Respondent: RON HAYNES, WARDEN
Small, Jr v. Exco Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04133
Plaintiff: Robert Small, Jr
Defendant: Exco Services, Inc., Haynes, James Scott Trust et al, Adell Sims Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?