Cases 41 - 50 of 3,199
Campbell v. Vazquez et al
as 2:2024cv10394
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Campbell
Defendant:
Clinton Vazquez, Logan Township Police Department and United States Marshal Service
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cruz v. Reid-Anderson
as 24-10103
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz, derivatievely on behalf of Nominal Defendant Six Flags Entertainment Corp
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W. Roedel and others
United States v. Richard Marshall
as 24-1202
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Wesley Marshall
Marshall v. Kovo HealthTech Corporation
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Marshall and Jonathan Marshall
Defendant:
Kovo HealthTech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Marshall v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Gus Who Marshall
Defendant:
State of California, U.S. Government, Valley Water and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Marshall v. DVA
as 24-1330
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE MARSHALL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Marshall
as 2:2024mc50005
Not Yet Classified:
Darrell Lamar Marshall
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
