Cases 41 - 50 of 365
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Djedi Order v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DJEDI ORDER and Heru Spencer
Defendant:
State of Montana, State Of Florida, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae:
Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
