Cases 1 - 10 of 17,612
Palmer v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
John J. Palmer
Defendant:
Rosario Adams, Stephanie Ochoa, Erika Garcia-Rdz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KEARNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
ERICA KEARNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gradford v. Perez et al
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
William J. Gradford
Defendant:
A. Perez, Warden and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn v. Kansas Attorney General, Office of et al
as 2:2024cv02269
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General, Office of, Kansas, State of, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Zastrow et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Calvin Zastrow, Kenneth Tyler Scott, Chester Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Iliya v. United States Marshalls Service
as 3:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Dauda Iliya
Defendant:
United States Marshalls Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gene Scott v. United States
as 24-2256
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant:
United States of America
Patel v. Jaddou et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kirankumar Vinodchandra Patel
Defendant:
Ur Jaddou and The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raines v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ian Raines
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOGEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
MALPHINE FOGEL
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
