Cases 91 - 100 of 12,952
Williams, Lee A. v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv21879
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Williams
Defendant:
J. Lee, T. Anderson, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Talutto et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Talutto, Warden Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Dunahue v. Curry Branham, et al
as 24-1983
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Avery, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Tucker Max, ADC and others
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wachter v. Nickel et al
as 3:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Andrew Nickel and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
