Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 80,797
Lee Jones v. Harold May
as 24-3488
Petitioner: LEE JONES
Respondent: HAROLD MAY, Warden
Eric Newton, Jr. v. Tom Watson
as 24-3485
Petitioner: ERIC SAMUEL NEWTON, JR.
Respondent: TOM WATSON, Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Eddie Julian-Bey v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1495
Plaintiff: EDDIE ARMALL JULIAN-BEY
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden and others
Block v. Boncher, et al
as 24-1530
Plaintiff: WAYLEN BLOCK
Defendant: WARDEN AMY BONCHER, in her official and individual capacity as Warden for FMC Devens, SINCADA, in his official capacity as acting Case Manager for petitioner at FMC Devens, HANSEN, as acting Councilor for petitioner at FMC evens in official capacity and others
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner: Michael James Gobert
Respondent: Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv04703
Plaintiff: Tony Williams
Defendant: Warden Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00469
Petitioner: Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01663
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Geer v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff: Anthony J. Geer
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?