Cases 31 - 40 of 113,858
United States of America v. Jose Catalan-Avila.
as 1:2024cv04825
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Catalan-Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
Theryn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Ervin Singleton, Erwin Debinion Singleton, Ervin Debinion Singleton and others
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Givens v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Starks v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00714
Petitioner:
Calvin Starks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sejnoha v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04107
Plaintiff:
Jason Sejnoha
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
