Cases 41 - 50 of 27,454
Robinson v. Lamb et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Lamb, Assistant Warden Norman, Colonel Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Gerald K Smith
Defendant:
D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
Patrick Morrsey, William K. Marshell, III, Shelby O. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Robert McClinton
as 24-6488
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT ALLEN MCCLINTON, a/k/a Trigga
HOUGH v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
CHAMPION OC'EAN HOUGH
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, CAPTAIN PLAT, SGT. SERODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singletary v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Singletary
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling, Jana Hollis, Stephen Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill, Amanda K. Brailsford and David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv02381
Petitioner:
Darryl Phelps
Respondent:
Superintendent K. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
