Cases 51 - 60 of 1,189,206
Reed v. Cooke et al
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, Drummond, Ruebart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero v. Auram et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Aaron Guerrero
Defendant:
Auram and Director of Nursing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE LIMA v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06925
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ESPANARUIZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06930
Petitioner:
JHON JAIRO ESPANARUIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02112
Petitioner:
Stephen Brooks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Buffaloe, Jr. et al
as 5:2024ct03149
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lee Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bey v. Potton et al.
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson Bey
Defendant:
Charle Potton, Michael O'Malley, Cuyahoga County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
GUGGENHEIMER v. MASON et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
LUCAS GUGGENHEIMER
Respondent:
MASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
