Cases 61 - 70 of 565
Chaney v. Ellis County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2022cv02478
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Chaney
Defendant:
Ellis County Sheriff Office, Wellpath to hope and healing, Terry NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Telly Hopings, Jr. v. Charmaine Bracy
as 22-3907
Petitioner / Appellant:
TELLY HOPINGS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARMAINE BRACY, Warden
Hogya v. Cullotta et al
as 1:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Hope Hogya
Defendant:
Judge Vincent Cullotta, Alexandra Kutz and Brent Urankar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Hogya v. Cannon et al
as 1:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Hope Hogya
Defendant:
Timothy Cannon, Sharleen Connolly and Lake County Probate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hogya v. State of Ohio
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Hope Crystal Hogyo
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hope v. USA
as 5:2022cv00341
Petitioner:
Dominique Hope
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Austin Lightfeather v. Abby Osborn, et al
as 22-2765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather, also known as Austin Edward Bower, also known as Austin Edward Gautney
Defendant / Appellee:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
PRICE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
DELLWAYNE PRICE
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, LIEUTENANT HATCHER and SERGEANT HOPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Koonce-Hope v. James Ruth, et al
as 22-12555
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLAS KOONCE-HOPE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES A. RUTH and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Austin Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln
as 22-2570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Lincoln
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
