Cases 1 - 10 of 31,656
Phelps v. Edwards et al
as 3:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
John Doe and Eddie L. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Couch et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Defendant:
Sean Ervin, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gerald Couch and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50390
Defendant:
Carpenter, Chess, Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08901
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe and Toni Perwinkle
Plaintiff:
Jack Wayne Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEEPLES v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Defendant:
'ICE EM', KALLIS, S. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JOE W. PEEPLES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilmore v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv08744
Defendant:
Kehoe, Medina, Tuaj and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosenbaum v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Defendant:
John Doe, Danielle Smith, United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sumrall v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00578
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Sumrall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mni Inilaya v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Wanbli Hanska Mni Inilaya
Defendant:
John Does, N. Sharkey, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallett v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00129
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-129-O and Bailey Jones
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
