Cases 1 - 10 of 80,970
(PC) Ruth v. Warden, Valley State Prison
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Eber G Ruth
Defendant:
Warden, Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03360
Petitioner:
Daniel Seals
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SELAGE
as 3:2024cv07178
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SELAGE
Defendant:
MERCER CORRECTION CENTER, CHARLES ELLIS, WARDEN, DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR ASA PARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
George v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Terrance George
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benson v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02714
Petitioner:
Kim Demetriu Benson
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director, C. Pfieffer and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirland v. Ziegler et al
as 1:2024cv22396
Plaintiff:
Alfred Kirkland
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Ziegler, Captain Etienne, Sergeant Chance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
LESANE v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
ERIC JAMEL LESANE
Defendant:
FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024at00495
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Jason Schultz and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv01537
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
