Cases 121 - 130 of 244
Nalco Company, et al v. David Chen
as 15-3604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NALCO COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID T. CHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
NALCO MOBOTEC, INC.
Chen et al v. eBay Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05048
Plaintiff:
Theo Chen , Edgar Amirkhanyan , Eugene Cobb and others
Defendant:
eBay Inc. and PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hu et al v. Chan et al
as 1:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jiaxi Hu , Mengfang Li , Xiaoyan Wu and others
Defendant:
Terry Chan, Gary Chan, Martin Angiulli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hitt v. Vericlaim, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hitt
Defendant:
Vericlaim, Inc., Iron Horse Recovery, LLC, Yuan Tai Furniture, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHEN et al v. MASON et al
as 2:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHEN and STEPHANIE CHEN
Defendant:
DARIUS MASON and VENEZLA MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tiger Bay Village Corporation v. Shauqiang Chen et al
as 2:2015cv06377
Defendant:
Shauqiang Chen, Steven Chen, an individual and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Tiger Bay Village Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wathen v. Chen et al
as 1:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Samuel Thomas Wathen
Defendant:
Paul L. Chen and Shanghai Industries Group, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zhao et al v. Huang
as 8:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ling Chen and Zemin Zhao
Defendant:
Ji Feng Huang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Chen et al v. eBay Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03444
Plaintiff:
Theo Chen , Edgar Amirkhanyan , Eugene Cobb and others
Defendant:
eBay Inc. and Paypal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CED Technologies International, Inc. v. Chen et al
as 3:2015cv00813
Defendant:
Peter Chen and ARCCA Incorporated
Plaintiff:
CED Technologies International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
