Cases 161 - 170 of 455
Kiel James Patrick, LLC et al v. Feishuang et al
as 1:2019cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kiel James Patrick, LLC and Kiel James Patrick Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Gu Feishuang, Cloudflare, Inc., PayPal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 4:2019cv40144
Defendant:
Tidal, Horus Music Video Distribution, PayPal and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Mohan et al v. Paypal, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Webbank, Loanbuilder, Paypal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marathon Healthcare Services, LLC and Merrill Mohan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 4:2019cv00333
Defendant:
TIDAL, Horus Music Video Distribution, PayPal and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. C. Penny Corp. Inc.v. PayPal Inc
as 5:2019mc80253
Respondent:
PayPal Inc
Petitioner:
J. C. Penny Corp. Inc.
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 8:2019cv02531
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Tidal, PayPal and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Eckert, et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-16869
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KUNZE, TIO NETWORKS ULC, JOHN D. RAINEY, Jr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN K. BELL, Lead Plaintiffs and MICHAEL ECKERT
Griffin v. Zuckerberg et al
as 7:2019cv07821
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, PayPal, Prakash Kondepudi and others
Plaintiff:
Casimir P. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo Jr. v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2019cv04740
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Synchrony Financial, PayPal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Castillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Limtung v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04316
Plaintiff:
Hin Y. Limtung
Defendant:
Jeanette Santiago, PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Eden Moldvani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.