Cases 51 - 60 of 179
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PEMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.01 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.36 ACRES + IN LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. P8-5-4 et al
as 5:2019cv01135
Defendant:
SHERRY HILL FARMS, LLC, MAXINE RIPPER, NICHOLAS F. AUGELLO and others
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 2.08 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 2.28 ACRES IN KIDDER TOWNSHIP, CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 45-00020-A14 et al
as 3:2019cv00462
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 2.08 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 2.28 ACRES IN KIDDER TOWNSHIP, CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 45-20-A14, ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS and F&N INVESTMENTS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-044.500, WV-MA-ML-044.970, and WV-MA-ML-045.000, et al
as 5:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Any Unknown Owners, Sandra A. Weaver, Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-044.500, WV-MA-ML-044.970, and WV-MA-ML-045.000 and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-065.000 et al
as 5:2019cv00087
Defendant:
David F. Bierkortte, Jr., Amy Bierkortte, Any Unknown Owners and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 5.84 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Karen Sue Eggert Inman, Judy J. Worlitz, 1.40 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.98 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01848
Defendant:
Donna Kaufmann and William W. Kaufmann as Trustees of the William W. Kaufmann and Donna Kaufmann Trust Dated May 4, 2017, Karla J. Machens Trust Dated March 10, 1995, 0.60 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 7.48 Acres, More or Less, in Lovingston District, Nelson Co., Virginia, Located on Parcel ID No. 70 A 1, Identified as General Warranty Deed in Book 29, Page 422, of the Public Records of Said Co.; et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Beverly Borenstein, Mary Callaway, Carl Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01227
Defendant:
Jonathan R. Vinson, F & M Bank, Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.31 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, et al
as 4:2018cv01327
Defendant:
2.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, GULF CENTRAL PIPELINE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SPIRE STL PIPELINE LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.28 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Capital Commerce Mortgage Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 2.85 Acres, More or Less, In Greensville County, Virginia et al. PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 3:2018cv00702
Defendant:
Latonia N. Wilson, The Unknown Heirs of Charlie Blount, Wesley Blunt and others
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
