Cases 131 - 140 of 828,707
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Norberg et al v. CentraCare Health System et al
as 0:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Dan Norberg and Susan Norberg
Defendant:
CentraCare Health System doing business as CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital, The Saint Cloud Hospital doing business as CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital, CentraCare Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. MD Exam LLC
as 1:2024cv22064
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Defendant:
MD Exam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. BOF Medical Center, Inc.
as 1:2024cv22065
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Defendant:
BOF Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division v. Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad
as 0:2024cv02047
Petitioner:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Defendant:
Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Thurmond v. United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Edwan S. Thurmond
Defendant:
United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
