Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv01628
Plaintiff:
Peter Moses Gutierrez, Jr., Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, Rajaskaran Wickramasekaran and others
Defendant:
Amplify Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC, Doe Corps and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Beyond Business Incorporated d/b/a Big Fish Bait & Tackle, Charlie's Gyros, Inc., Jennifer Taylor and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Amplify Energy Corp. and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
Costamare Shipping Co. S.A., Cosco Beijing, Capetanissa Maritime Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
V. Ships Greece Ltd., V.Ships Greece Ltd., Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor doing business as Marine Exchange of Southern California and others
Special Master:
Daniel Garrie, James L. Smith and Bradley O'Brien
Petitioner:
Christopher Hamm, Randal Klein and Todd Snyder
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd., Ascot Underwriting Inc., QBE European Co Operations (Lloyds's Syndicate 1036) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Certain Insurers At Lloyd's of London And London Markets Subscribing To Policy No. B0180ME2001399, Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A., DOES 1-5 and others
Cross Claimant:
Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Samar Abdelghany et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 8:2021cv00804
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, T-Mobile, USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Carl Ong, Margaret Burgardt, Steven Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samar Abdelghany et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2021cv03492
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, T-Mobile, USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Carl Ong, Margaret Burgardt, Steven Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Devillier et al v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff:
Richard & Wendy Devillier, Yale Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kyle H. Devillier, Chris & Darla Barrow and others
Interested Party:
CivilCorp, LLC and City of Anahuac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Barnes et al v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
Bryan O. Dantzler, W. Earl Finley, Nancy Susan Jones and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Taylor v. Deutsche Bank Nation Trust Company et al
as 2:2018cv14239
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Unidentified Parties and Deutsche Bank Nation Trust Company
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03366
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linda Long, Billy Long, Rhonda Sharkey and others
Defendant:
Williams Holdings, Inc., National Foam Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Deanne Lopez, Mary Niemetz, Janet Bahner and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Protection Co., Angus Fire, Chemguard and others
Interested Party:
Widefield W&S District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
West Morgan - East Lawrence v. Charles Owens, et al
as 17-12381
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES OWENS, ANGELIA ABBASI, MOHAMMAD ABBASI and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, TOMMY LINDSEY, LANETTE LINDSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC and DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.
:
SERVICE
Owens et al v. 3M Company, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00346
Plaintiff:
Charles Owens , Alexis Acosta , Vanessa Acosta and others
Defendant:
3M Company Inc , Daikin America Inc and Dyneon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Benafel v. United States Department of Tr, et al
as 16-35827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY C. BENAFEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ANTHONY FOXX, ROSS REINEKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
