Cases 1 - 10 of 1,883
United States of America v. Barkalow et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tracy Barkalow, Cassie Barkalow and Striped Lawns & Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Trespass on Public Land
Qum Qasr Series LLC - AUG Protected Series v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Qum Qasr Series LLC - AUG Protected Series
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
United States of America v. Decker Coal Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Decker Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
ACI Construction v. United States, et al
as 24-4059
Appellant:
ACI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Counter Defendant:
SID CROOKSTON, LLC
RC Smithfield v. United States
as 24-4057
Plaintiff:
RC SMITHFIELD, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rose et al v. Fairfield County Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
James Rose and Christine Rose
Defendant:
Fairfield County Bank and United States of America Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hicks et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
TED HICKS and GRAND LAKE LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Cullen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Korr Enterprises, Inc. v. USA
as 24-1399
Plaintiff:
KORR ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Barnes, et al v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Don Barnes and James Bice
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, National Park Service, Great Smokey Mountains National Park and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
