Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Guy Hingston v. Google Inc et al
as 8:2012cv02202
Plaintiff:
Guy Hingston
Defendant:
Google Inc and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Fine v. ESPN, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Laurie J. Fine
Defendant:
ESPN, Inc., Mark Schwarz and Arthur Berko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali v. Facebook
as 1:2012cv04793
Plaintiff:
HaNiyyah N. Ali
Defendant:
Facebook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Echenique v. Google Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv00883
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Defendant:
You tube and Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welbourne et al v. The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey et al
as 1:2012cv04424
Plaintiff:
Tomas Welbourne and Clara Welbourne
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and Marelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilman v. Spitzer et al
as 1:2011cv05843
Plaintiff:
William Gilman
Defendant:
Eliot Spitzer and The Slate Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin Gutter King Corporation, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Austin Gutter King Corporation, Inc. and Gary Kulp
Defendant:
"Norma" Doe and Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sarah Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Reco, et al
as 12-5133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH JONES
Defendant:
DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT RECORDINGS LLC, dba Thedirt.com and DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
Defendant - Appellant:
HOOMAN KARAMIAN, aka Nik Richie, aka Corbin Grimes and DIRTY WORLD, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
C. v. Dirty World, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00392
Defendant:
Dirty World, LLC and Nik Richie
Plaintiff:
S. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hare v. Richie et al
as 1:2011cv03488
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harvey Hare
Defendant:
Nik Richie, Dirty, Inc., The Dirty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
