Cases 21 - 30 of 48
King v. Couvillion
as 2:2015cv05176
Plaintiff:
Terry King
Defendant:
Robert E. Couvillion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLADO v. SORIANO et al
as 2:2015cv04247
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL COLLADO
Defendant:
MIGUEL SORIANO and KIM KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Superior Cranes Inc
as 4:2015cv02151
Plaintiff:
Richard Eric King
Defendant:
Superior Cranes Inc
Counter_claimant:
Superior Cranes Inc
Counter_defendant:
Richard Eric King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finance Ventures, LLC et al v. King
as 4:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Finance Ventures, LLC and Richard G. Maike
Defendant:
Charles "Chuck" King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Meek
as 1:2014cv02079
Plaintiff:
Mark W. King
Defendant:
John B. Meek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard King v. Patti Labelle, et al
as 14-20737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD C. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
PATTI LABELLE, also known as Patricia Edwards, ZURI KYE EDWARDS, EFREN HOLMES and others
Wellin et al v. Wellin
as 2:2014cv04067
Plaintiff:
Peter J Wellin , Cynthia Wellin Plum and Marjorie Wellin King
Defendant:
Wendy Wellin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Overcash v. Swigert et al
as 5:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
William Todd Overcash and Carolyn Torrey
Defendant:
Willam Swigert, Barbara Gurrola, Daniel B. Merritt, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bourne v. Arruda, Jr., et al
as 13-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL J. BOURNE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. ARRUDA, JR., individually and officially, MICHAEL R. BROOKS, individually and officially and MADISON, TOWN OF
Defendant:
ROBERT D. KING
Vrlina Nozlic v. Evelyn Thomas, et al
as 12-35572
Defendant - Appellee:
EVELYN THOMAS, Circle of Friends (AFH), ERYL WILLIAMS, King County Mental Health Worker, KING COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH and others
Movant - Appellant:
VRLINA NOZLIC, ADA Advocate/Rep for plaintiff Andrew Michael Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
