Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Nixon v. Stiness et al
as 4:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Tony Nixon
Defendant:
William Stiness , Daniel Guzman , Henry Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Castellanos v. Long Island Rail Road Company et al
as 2:2015cv03445
Plaintiff:
Fulvio Castellanos
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company, Daniel F. Pasquino and Sara L. Pasquino
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Anderson v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
as 0:2015cv02672
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Anderson
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pawlowski v. CSX Transportation Inc.
as 3:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Pawlowski
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Barani v. Department of Defense
as 1:2015cv03102
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barani
Defendant:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Barani v. Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2015cv03108
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barani
Defendant:
Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Barani v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
as 1:2015cv03109
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barani
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Burani v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2015cv03105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barani
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Estate of Mary Honda et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Estate of Mary Honda, Kathleen Honda, Carter Jorissen and others
Defendant:
Adam Stewart Rojas and United States of America
MCFADDEN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv05522
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MCFADDEN
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
