Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dawson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Danny Dawson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Turpin v. Cleveland-Cliffs South Chicago & Indiana Harbor Railway Inc.
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Danny Turpin
Defendant:
Cleveland-Cliffs South Chicago & Indiana Harbor Railway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Caldwell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Danny Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pierce v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00484
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Danny Pierce and Danny E. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SAPP v. THE INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. SAPP
Defendant:
THE INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
as 17-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. RUARK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Norris v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Norris
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Howard et al v. Cody et al
as 3:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Layton Howard and Vivian Howard
Defendant:
Danny Keith Cody and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruark v Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00329
Plaintiff:
Danny R Ruark
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ragan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny J Ragan
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
