Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Marlin et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00802
Plaintiff:
Cain Marlin , James Marlin and Tex-Ann Sudberry
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc and Markethe Dewayne Becan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keys, et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc., et al
as 6:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Darla Keys, Jill Cheramie and Daniel Waddoups
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc , Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arceo et al v. US Xpress Inc
as 4:2017cv05192
Plaintiff:
Pedro Arceo and Maria Contreras-Arceo
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Schlemmer v. Wofford et al
as 1:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
Teresa Schlemmer
Defendant:
Denver Wofford, Jr and US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annese v. US Xpress Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Andrea T Annese
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc and Glenn Anders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. US Xpress, Inc.
as 7:2017cv04353
Defendant:
US Xpress, Inc. and Christopher Reed
Plaintiff:
Devon Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madrid v. Strickland et al
as 1:2017cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jesus Madrid
Defendant:
Latrell Strickland , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and US Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Morris et al
as 5:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Willis Eric Smith
Defendant:
Pauline Morris, US Xpress, Inc. , Mark Coston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mansion et al v. Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02223
Plaintiff:
Bernard Mansion and Karla T. Mansion
Defendant:
Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. , US Xpress, Inc. , Michael A. Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANSON v. US XPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01390
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRANSON
Defendant:
US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., US XPRESS, INC. and MARTIN WAMBUI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
