Cases 31 - 40 of 52
RINTYE et al v. MITCHELL
as 2:2016cv06289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RINTYE and CATHERINE RINTYE
Defendant:
DESIREE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lhotka v. Schwantes et al
as 5:2016cv04065
Plaintiff:
Desiree Lhotka
Defendant:
Gary Schwantes , Lenz Sales and Service and Progressive Universal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morley et al v. Medic One LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Roy Morley and Wendy Morley
Defendant:
Medic One LLC, Daniel Rivera, Desiree Hawkins Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. West
as 5:2015cv04176
Plaintiff:
Desiree M Ross
Defendant:
Glenda F West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Russo et al v. GEICO Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv02612
Plaintiff:
Desiree C Russo and Debra Pettis
Defendant:
GEICO Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Brian Lee Morehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Connell v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv07267
Plaintiff:
Desiree O'Connell
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and John Doe
Respondent:
Bruce Edward Navert and Bruce Edward Nauert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2014cv05191
Plaintiff:
DESIREE PERRY
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner et al v. Pronobis
as 3:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Desiree Warner and Aubrey Warner
Defendant:
Lynn Pronobis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rampersaud et al v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Harold Rampersaud and Desiree Rampersaud
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson et al v. United States et al
as 2:2014cv10444
Defendant:
United States and Nathan Neibauer
Plaintiff:
Desiree Thompson and Ashante Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
