Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Huff v. Newcomer
as 1:2014cv04060
Plaintiff:
Sharhonda Huff
Defendant:
Curtis Newcomer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, et al
as 13-8082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN L. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HUFF & PUFF TRUCKING, INC., a Tennessee Corporation and DONALD STEWART
REEVES v. HARRIS CAMDEN TERMINAL EQUIPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05640
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY REEVES
Defendant:
HARRIS CAMDEN TERMINAL EQUIPMENT, INC. , HARRIS TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC , HARRIS TRANSPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Mathis
Defendant:
Huff & Puff Trucking Inc and Donald Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kwiatkowski et al v. Teton Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01302
Plaintiff:
Piotr Kwiatkowski and Magdelina Kwiatkowski
Defendant:
Teton Transportation, Inc. and Randall Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF v. WILGENBUSCH
as 4:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. HUFF
Defendant:
ANTONETTA M. WILGENBUSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sandra v. Danard et al
as 1:2010cv01020
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Huff
Defendant:
Matthew Allan Danard and Professional Freight Management
Thirdparty_defendant:
Jim D. Huff
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Matthew Allan Danard and Professional Freight Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff v. Danard et al
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Jim D. Huff
Defendant:
Matthew Allan Danard and Professional Freight Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cummings et al v. G. et al
as 3:2010cv01442
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Cummings and Viola Huff
Defendant:
J. G., Michael R. Otto, II, Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Huff v. Rolls et al
as 2:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maressa C. Huff and Maressa C. Huff
Defendant:
Anthony Rolls and Marathon Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
