Cases 1 - 10 of 25
DIVINCENZO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv16238
Plaintiff:
GIORGIO DIVINCENZO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and CHARLES W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jarrett v. Ledesma et al
as 1:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Jarrett
Defendant:
Dominga Ledesma and Domingo Ledesma
Cross Defendant:
Mary Jane Cuevas
Respondent:
LM General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
WUSSICK v. MOFFITT et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Charles W Wussick
Defendant:
Gail E Moffitt, Farmers Casualty Insurance Company and Timothy L Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MCDOUGALL et al v. HOBBS et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. MCDOUGALL and CAROL B. MCDOUGALL
Defendant:
CHARLES W. HOBBS and RAGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swindle v. Christy et al
as 5:2020cv06013
Defendant:
Jack Lee Aaron Christy and California Overland, LTD
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Swindle and Diana K. Swindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weinmer v. Love
as 3:2019cv00842
Plaintiff:
Karen Y. Weinmer
Defendant:
Charles W. Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Love
as 3:2019cv00821
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Griffin
Defendant:
Charles W. Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goltz v. Contract Transportation Systems Co. et al
as 3:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Goltz
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Brackett and Contract Transportation Systems Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wimmer v. East-West Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Wimmer
Defendant:
East-West Express, Inc. and Richard S. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Batieste v. Turner et al
as 2:2015cv03828
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Batieste
Defendant:
Charles W. Turner , National Trust Insurance Company and TC Construction, Inc. of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
