Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Miller et al v. Brack et al
as 3:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Miller, Patrick Amos Robichaud and Patricia Ann Robichaud
Defendant:
Cristiana A. Brack, Paul Dorin Trif and Inka Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Buckner v. Miller et al
as 4:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Clyde Alvin Buckner
Defendant:
Robert Henry Miller and PV Holding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MILLER et al v. EMERY et al
as 2:2020cv04411
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T MILLER and MILLER M KRISTA
Defendant:
ELTON J STEVEN and ELTON E EMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER et al v. ELTON et al
as 5:2020cv04411
Plaintiff:
KRISTA M MILLER and ROBERT T MILLER
Defendant:
STEVEN J ELTON and EMERY E ELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. BARROSO et al
as 1:2017cv07478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J MILLER, SR.
Defendant:
JUAN BARROSO , JOHN BARROSO TRUCKING , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHESNUT v. CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03166
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHESNUT
Defendant:
CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION and ROBERT D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill-Jackson v. FAF, Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv01296
Defendant:
DOUBLE J TRANSPORT, DOUBLE J TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, FAF, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROLANDA HILL-JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hill-Jackson v. FAF, Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rolanda Hill-Jackson
Defendant:
FAF, Inc., a Tennessee corporation , Forward Air, Inc., a Tennessee corporation , Double J Transport, a Wisconsin Limited Liability Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sumner v. Miller
as 5:2007cv05015
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Sumner and Tony C. Sumner
Defendant:
Robert L Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
