Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Bhasker et al v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Helen Bhasker and Yuliana Garcia
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Stephen John Papathopoulos and Lyft Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DOE A.F. v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03990
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE A.F.
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and NTIAMOAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. C.B., LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
C.B., LLC doing business as Reggie's Bar, Reggie's Bar, Darin P. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ramsey v. Lyft Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Reynold Ramsey
Defendant:
Lyft Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Garcia v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03897
Defendant:
John Doe, Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft Drives South Carolina, Inc., Kristi and others
Plaintiff:
Zhanna Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and NAOUFAL JELLALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Newman v. Lyft, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Lisa Newman
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Woods et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Estate of Romualdo Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods
Defendant:
Melinda Hotchkins and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
