Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Ford v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Ford
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORALES v. CARROLS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2013cv05979
Plaintiff:
SHARELIS MORALES
Defendant:
CARROLS CORPORATION, BURGER KING, LEWIS TAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Callahan v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00413
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation, SRAC Holdings I, Inc. and XYZ Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bob P Callahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ross v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv03546
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Burger King Worldwide
Plaintiff:
Randi Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Levy v. Burger King, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01019
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Burger King, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trout v. Burger King Corporation
as 5:2013cv05026
Plaintiff:
David E. Trout and Audra Trout
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation , Burger King Holdings, Inc. , Burger King Worldwide Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jordan v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2013cv00324
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Levy v. Burger King, Inc.
as 1:2013cv20763
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Burger King, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Briggs v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Arlenda Briggs
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cronic et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2011cv04108
Plaintiff:
Goldie Faye Cronic and William Ted Cronic
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
