Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Centuori v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
Mark Centuori
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Gwenell Davis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , United Parcel Service General Services Co. and BT Property, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pritchett v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2015cv03594
Plaintiff:
Nunzi Pritchett
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. United Parcel Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Natalie Roberts and Martin Maestas
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc., UPS Insurance Agency, Inc., UPS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc , Liberty Mutual Insurance Co and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01363
Plaintiff:
Mark Perkins
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaiser v. United Parcel Service, Inc - See #9 Order dismissing parties
as 6:2015cv02052
Plaintiff:
MaryJo Kaiser
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asiago v. Chegg, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Asiago
Defendant:
Chegg, Inc. , United Parcel Service, Inc. and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Muzzarelli v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 1:2015cv01169
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Jill . Muzzarelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
