Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lanigan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00668
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
James Lanigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aucoin et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11803
Plaintiff:
John Simadis, Evelyn Torres, Edward Springer and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Zoila Cortez v. Big Apple Wrecking & Construct
as 12-87
Plaintiff:
Robert Waniurski, Jim McLoughlin, Krzysztof Walek and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Enny Espinosa, Enrique Arrieta, Jorge Garcia and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Frank Pasqua, Roman Markut, Slawomir Peski and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Board of Education of the City of New York, Gilsanz Murray Steficek LLP, Skidmore Owings and Merrill, L.L.P. and others
Claimant:
Donna Goldsworthy, Stanley Salata, Amy Mozes and others
Not Yet Classified:
Florence Steinbrecher
Aquino v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02697
Plaintiff:
Damarie Aquino
Defendant:
The City of New York , New York City Department Of Corrections , Bernard B. Kerik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanigan et al v. GGNSC Stanford, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jean Lanigan
Defendant:
GGNSC Stanford, LLC , GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC , GGNSC Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lanigan et al v. San Juan Marriott Resort & Stellaris Casino, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01887
Plaintiff:
Joan Lanigan and Edward Lanigan
Defendant:
San Juan Marriott Resort & Stellaris Casino, Inc., Marriott International, Inc., John Does 1, 2 and 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANIGAN et al v. MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv05201
Plaintiff:
DEXTER LANIGAN and JAMIE LANIGAN
Defendant:
MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, MGM MIRAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
