Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LEWIS v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. SPEEDWAY, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01833
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY, LLC, SPEEDWAY, LLC (STORE -0006796) and SHIELDS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rich Grossi Snow Removal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10171
Plaintiff:
Verlesa Berry, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Michael Prysby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Hendry
as 2:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
Jarrod Hendry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13790
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Adams
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Lewis v. Seven Seas Cruises S. De R.L., LLC
as 1:2018cv20146
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
Seven Seas Cruises S. De R.L., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harden v. Wayne et al
as 2:2017cv11039
Plaintiff:
Darryl Harden
Defendant:
County of Wayne , Michael Gatson, Michael Sebastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Smith et al
as 9:2016cv01458
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Williams, Jr and Harriett Williams
Defendant:
Sherri Smith and Broad Creek Landing Horizontal Property Regime Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Norton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30187
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Norton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
