Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv12138
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DeBrock v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05118
Plaintiff:
Teresa DeBrock
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John/Jane Doe 1, Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grange v. Prestige Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01561
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 2-10, Prestige Financial Services Inc., Repossession Company Auto Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DOE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN J. SICINSKI, KIM MCBROOM and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN DOE , ANN DOE , ELLEN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bates v. County of Saint Charles et al
as 4:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
Donald Bates
Defendant:
County of Saint Charles , County of Saint Charles Department of Corrections , Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
OSHAUGHNESSY v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00960
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. OSHAUGHNESSY
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cross Claimant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
