Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stotts v. Lehnardt
as 5:2023cv06109
Plaintiff:
James Stotts
Defendant:
Stephen K. Lehnardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
as 3:2018md02843
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, Cambridge Analytica, Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Nunez, Howard O'Kelly, Ashley Gennock and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Madeline Kiss
Petitioner:
Block & Leviton LLP
Not Classified By Court:
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Sarah Feldman, Jill Mahaney and others
Special Master:
Daniel Garrie
Interested Party:
Rachel Banks Kupcho and Styleform IT
Intervenor:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MacDonald v. Hopper et al
as 1:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Anne MacDonald
Defendant:
Stephen Hopper, Stephen K Hopper, Steve Ray Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Whisenhunt v. Westrock Texas LP et al
as 1:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Westrock Texas LP and Stephen K Morgan
Plaintiff:
Derral Wayne Whisenhunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Cutright, et al v. Norfolk Southern, et al
as 1:2005cv00115
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R Cutright, Tina Bevington, Jessica Curtis and others
Petitioner:
Christy T Dalton, Robert M Bell, Erwin J Leizerman and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, John Does 1 thru 10 and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Interested Party:
Douglas Schmidt
Not Classified By Court:
Barry Cook, Lewis Frye, Dana Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darryl McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 11-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MCKENZIE, MORRIS LAWN AND LANDSCAPE, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant:
WILLIAM HALL, DAISIAH WHACK, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Jessica Curtis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 10-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD, JAMES SPLAWN and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant:
DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Elizabeth Cutright v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 10-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10, Norfolk Southern Railway Crewmembers and Residents of South Carolina
Christy Dalton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 09-2366
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - None:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Movant - None:
ROOSEVELT WALKER, DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
