Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Shaw v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv02589
Plaintiff:
Oliver Douglas Shaw
Defendant:
United States of America and Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Greco D.O. et al v. Matthew Todd Ahern DO et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Defendant:
Encinitas Hospitalist Associates, Scott Alan Eisman MD, Marisa M. Magana MD and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren Larue and Gabriella Francesca Greco D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm
Shaw et al v. Liu et al
as 1:2020cv01860
Defendant:
Kenneth C. Liu, M.D. and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Scott Shaw and Ashley Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. The United States of Amercia et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
Norma Shaw
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie and The United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00487
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Shaw et al v. Boaz et al
as 1:2018cv02708
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw and Kimberley Shaw
Defendant:
David S. Boaz, M.D. , South Forsyth Family Medicine and Pediatrics, LLC , Ali Mortazavi, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shaw v. Unk. Medical Director
as 1:2016cv09224
Plaintiff:
Jack Shaw
Defendant:
Unk. Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.T. et al v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
J.T. and Cecelia Shaw
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SHAW v. BARROSO
as 2:2015cv06690
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHAW
Defendant:
SOFIA BARROSO
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SEXTON et al v. RIZZETTA et al
as 1:2015cv05569
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON SEXTON and ESTATE OF BRETT J. SEXTON
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. RIZZETTA, D.O., JOEL S. STEINBERG, M.D., LEAH LOMBARDO, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
